H. Comprehensive Assessment of the Person with TBI


A comprehensive assessment of each person is necessary because brain injury results in a complex mix of physical, emotional and cognitive changes. It is essential to understand the person’s experience, skills and abilities prior to the brain injury to understand the impact of the brain injury. Early post brain injury, the Glasgow Coma Scale provides insights into the severity of the brain injury. During the period of post-traumatic amnesia (PTA), a comprehensive assessment of cognition is not recommended because of the poor attention and likelihood of rapid changes. Standardized assessment of PTA can better quantify the duration of PTA and a number of tools exist. Musculoskeletal and other trauma is frequently associated with brain injury; therefore, it is important that those with severe musculoskeletal or spinal trauma be screened for concomitant cognitive and other sequelae of brain injury.

Health care professionals should be trained in using standardized tools to assess the person with brain injury including the Glasgow Coma Scale, Glasgow Outcome Scale, Activities of Daily Living and PTA Scales. The interprofessional team should include those with specialized skills and training in cognitive and behavioural assessment. These assessments may require the purchase of equipment and test materials.

Indicators exemples

  • Proportion of conscious individuals with TBI for whom there is evidence of assessment for each of the following six impairments:
    1. Motor impairments;
    2. Bulbar problems affecting speech and swallowing;
    3. Sensory dysfunction;
    4. Reduced control over bowels and bladder;
    5. Cognitive dysfunctions;
    6. Behavioural dysregulation
  • Proportion of individuals with TBI for whom there is evidence of assessment for each of the following eight cognitive impairments after emergence from PTA/PTD:
    1. Attention (including speed of processing);
    2. Visuospatial function;
    3. Executive function;
    4. Language, social communication;
    5. Social cognition;
    6. Learning and memory;
    7. Awareness of impairments;
    8. Detection/expression of emotion
  • Proportion of individuals with TBI for whom there is presence of a family/caregiver interview form completed in the chart.

The following are suggestions of tools and resources that can be used to support the implementation of the recommendations in this section. Healthcare professionals must respect the legal and normative regulations of the regulatory bodies, in particular with regards to scopes of practice and restricted/protected activities, as these may differ provincially

Clinical Tools:

To be Developed Locally:

  • Family interview forms

Individuals should be assessed for common impairments. Clinical assessments and protocols based on the Glasgow Coma Scale Score can guide the initial management. In some instances, relatives are able to offer clinicians information regarding the patient’s level of awareness that is more accurate than a patient’s self-report measure (Sohlberg, Mateer, Penkman, Glang, & Todis, 1998; Spikman, Boelen, Lamberts, Brouwer, & Fasotti, 2010). In an observational study, patients and relatives who completed functional assessment questionnaires focused on the patient following a rehabilitation program, both scored similarly (Svendsen, Teasdale, & Pinner, 2004).

The transition from post-traumatic coma to post-traumatic delirium (PTD) or PTA is characterized by impairments in selective and sustained attention (Arciniegas, 2010). During the period of PTA, impairments in executive functioning, language and declarative learning are prominent. When emerging from PTA, executive function deficits manifest in problem solving, abstract thinking and cognitive flexibility. Emotional lability is also present during PTA expressed as agitation and aggression (Ponsford & Sinclair, 2014). Neuropsychologists/psychiatrists have found the following outcome measures valuable in determining PTA duration and TBI severity: Glasgow Coma Scale and the Galveston orientation and amnesia test (Arciniegas, 2010).

When an individual emerges from PTA, cognitive function should be evaluated. Throughout this process, caregivers should receive information and education regarding the patient’s injury and care to reduce the burden of care (Calvete & de Arroyabe, 2012) and maintain their mental health (Doyle et al., 2013).

It is also important to assess individuals with other forms of poly trauma and particular spinal cord injury because the concomitant injuries have an impact on clinical recovery and costs of care. Individuals with traumatic SCI and TBI had worse cognitive function and higher rehabilitation costs compared to those without TBI (Bradbury et al., 2008). Sharma et al. (2014) found a 58.5% frequency of missed traumatic brain injuries in a sample of 92 individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury.

REFERENCES

Arciniegas, D. B. (2010). Neuropsychiatric Assessment of Traumatic Brain Injury During Acute Neurorehabilitation* Neuropsychiatric disorders (pp. 123-146): Springer.

Bradbury, C. L., Wodchis, W. P., Mikulis, D. J., Pano, E. G., Hitzig, S. L., McGillivray, C. F., . . . Green, R. E. (2008). Traumatic brain injury in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury: clinical and economic consequences. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 89(12 Suppl), S77-84.

Calvete, E., & de Arroyabe, E. L. (2012). Depression and grief in Spanish family caregivers of people with traumatic brain injury: The roles of social support and coping. Brain Injury, 26(6), 834-843.

Doyle, S. T., Perrin, P. B., Diaz Sosa, D. M., Espinosa Jove, I. G., Lee, G. K., & Arango-Lasprilla, J. C. (2013). Connecting family needs and TBI caregiver mental health in Mexico City, Mexico. Brain Injury, 27(12), 1441-1449.

Ponsford, J., & Sinclair, K. (2014). Sleep and fatigue following traumatic brain injury. Psychiatr Clin North Am, 37(1), 77-89.

Sharma, B., Bradbury, C., Mikulis, D., & Green, R. (2014). Missed Diagnosis of Traumatic Brain Injury in Patients with Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 46(4), 370-373.

Sohlberg, M. M., Mateer, C. A., Penkman, L., Glang, A., & Todis, B. (1998). Awareness intervention: Who needs it? J Head Trauma Rehabil, 13(5), 62-78.

Spikman, J. M., Boelen, D. H., Lamberts, K. F., Brouwer, W. H., & Fasotti, L. (2010). Effects of a multifaceted treatment program for executive dysfunction after acquired brain injury on indications of executive functioning in daily life. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 16(01), 118-129.

Svendsen, H., Teasdale, T., & Pinner, M. (2004). Subjective experience in patients with brain injury and their close relatives before and after a rehabilitation programme. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 14(5), 495-515.

P

Priority

F

Fundamental

N

New Level of Evidence

A

B

C



H.1.1

F

C

All individuals with traumatic brain injury who are conscious, including those in post-traumatic amnesia (PTA), should be assessed for common impairments including:  

  • Motor impairments, such as weakness, altered tone, balance and incoordination
  • Possible missed injuries/fractures
  • Pain
  • Bulbar problems affecting speech and swallowing
  • Sensory dysfunctions that may impact on safety including hearing loss, numbness, visual problems (including reduced acuity, visual field loss, gaze palsies)
  • Autonomic dysfunction (e.g. orthostatic hypotension, tachycardia etc.)
  • Endocrine dysfunction 
  • Sleep dysfunction 
  • Reduced control over bowels and bladder 
  • Cognitive dysfunctions such as impairments in attention, communication, orientation, memory and executive function 
  • Emotional and behavioural dysregulation

(Adapted from INCOG 2022, Assess #1, p. 12)

Last Updated June 2023


H.1.2

C

The initial management of individuals with traumatic brain injury should be guided by clinical assessments and protocols based on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score or the FOUR Scale score.  

(Adapted from ABIKUS 2007, G6, p. 16)

Last Updated June 2023


H.1.3

P

C

Assessment should include seeking information regarding pre-existing function and personality from the individual with traumatic brain injury and from individuals who knew the person before their injury. 

(Adapted from INCOG 2022, Assess #7, p. 13)

Last Updated June 2023


H.1.4

C

All individuals with traumatic brain injury who have emerged from post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) should have their cognitive function evaluated by a member of the interdisciplinary team including: 

  • Neuropsychologist: to conduct a formal cognitive assessment using validated neuropsychological tests including measures of effort, emotional status and behavioural problems 
  • Occupational therapist: to assess the impact of cognitive impairments on performance of meaningful activities and participation  
  • Speech-language pathologist: to assess the impact of cognitive impairments on communication (listening, speaking, reading, and writing) 

Assessment should be ongoing and collaborative. All professionals involved should aim to integrate their assessment findings, and avoid over testing or duplicating tests with each other. The results of these assessments should be used to create and adjust treatment plans.

(Adapted from INCOG 2022, Assess #5, p. 13)

Last Updated June 2023


H.1.5

P

C

After emerging from post-traumatic amnesia (PTA), all individuals with traumatic brain injury should be assessed for the presence of cognitive impairments in the following areas: 

  • Attention (including speed of processing) 
  • Visuospatial function 
  • Executive function 
  • Language, social communication 
  • Social cognition (including detection/expression of emotion) 
  • Learning and memory  
  • Awareness of impairments 

This assessment may include both standardized and non-standardized assessment tools, depending on the needs of the individual. The results of these assessments should be used to create and adjust treatment plans.  

(Adapted from INCOG 2022, Assess #3, p. 12)

Last Updated June 2023


H.1.6

N

C

All individuals with traumatic brain injury should have their physical functioning evaluated using both standardized and non-standardized assessments by a member of the interdisciplinary team including: 

  • Physiotherapist: to assess sensation, coordination, balance, tone, strength, range of motion and mobility. 
  • Occupational Therapist: to assess activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living and equipment needs. 
  • Physician (e.g., Physiatrist, Neurologist, Family physician): to assess medical comorbidities and screen for concurrent injury (e.g., musculoskeletal trauma, spinal cord injury). 
  • Nurse: to conduct an assessment of bowel and bladder function, pain, and skin integrity. 
  • Registered Dietitian: to assess body weight, hydration and nutritional needs 
  • Speech-language Pathologist: to assess swallowing, oral motor function, speech, and hearing 

Assessment should be ongoing and collaborative. All professionals involved should aim to integrate their assessment findings, and avoid over testing or duplicating tests with each other. The results of these assessments should be used to create and adjust treatment plans. 

Last Updated June 2023


H.1.7

N

C

All individuals with traumatic brain injury should have their psychosocial and emotional well-being evaluated using both standardized and non-standardized assessments by a member of the interdisciplinary team including: 

  • Social Worker: to obtain detailed social history information including gender, premorbid conditions, educational and vocational background, social supports, living circumstances, lifestyle habits, cultural and spiritual background 
  • Psychologist/Neuropsychologist: to assess emotional regulation, coping strategies, self-awareness  
  • Spiritual care: to assess religious/spiritual needs 
  • Therapeutic recreation specialist: to assess person’s leisure interests and goals 

Assessment should be ongoing and collaborative. All professionals involved should aim to integrate their assessment findings, and avoid over testing or duplicating tests with each other. The results of these assessments should be used to create and adjust treatment plans and make recommendations regarding available community resources. 

Last Updated June 2023


H.1.8

C

The person with traumatic brain injury and the primary caregiver should be informed and have a discussion about the diagnosis, prognosis, recovery process and treatments that are available.  

Last Updated June 2023


H.1.9

C

Healthcare professionals should screen for potential traumatic brain injury when the underlying mechanism of injury results in spinal cord injury, severe musculoskeletal trauma, or related trauma that may affect the brain. 

REFERENCES:

  • Sharma et al. (2014)
  • Bradbury et al. (2008)

Last Updated June 2023


H.1.10

C

Individuals with comorbidities, such as spinal cord injury or severe musculoskeletal injuries, should have timely access to interdisciplinary traumatic brain injury (TBI) services. TBI services should be offered concurrently with other therapies or should immediately follow former therapies. 

Last Updated June 2023